Skip to main content

ECCTA Defence File Pilot pricing

A 90-day pilot for turning ECCTA evidence work into a reviewable defence file.

The pilot is priced for a focused first implementation: scope posture, evidence gaps, associated-person attestations, human review, and board/adviser handoff. DefenceFile organises evidence for legal and compliance review. It does not provide legal advice, create privilege, certify scope, certify reasonable procedures, or guarantee that a statutory defence will succeed.

Pilot package

GBP 2,500 setup + GBP 950/month x 90 days

Setup
GBP 2,500
Monthly
GBP 950
Length
90 days

If the first working session does not produce the agreed workflow artifacts, the setup fee is waived.

Deliberately introductory founding-cohort pricing for early ECCTA pilots, set low to make the first internal step easy to approve.

After the 90-day pilot, continuation is month-to-month at GBP 950/month with no annual lock-in, and the founding-cohort monthly rate is held for 12 months from the pilot start. After that, the rate is reviewed at most once a year and any change is capped at UK CPI. Cancel in any month and export your board pack, evidence register, audit trail, and unresolved blocker list.

Signed order terms control any live engagement. The public page is a pricing summary for buyer review, not self-serve checkout.

Included in the pilot

Built around the first session and the evidence trail it creates.

Scope and nexus workpaper

Large-organisation prompts, UK nexus notes, uncertainty flags, reviewer ownership, and adviser-review reminders.

Evidence gap map

Evidence mapped to the six Home Office fraud-prevention principles with open blockers kept visible.

Human review trail

Draft classifications stay draft until a named reviewer records approval, rejection, or requested changes.

Board and adviser handoff

A board-pack readiness view that separates completed work, unresolved gaps, and legal-review points.

First-session artifacts

  • Scope posture screen using large-organisation and UK-nexus prompts.
  • Evidence gap map against the six Home Office fraud-prevention principles.
  • Associated-person attestation chase list with owner and status.
  • Named human-review queue for draft evidence classifications.
  • Board-pack blockers showing what is and is not ready for adviser or board review.

What the pilot looks like

Review the first-session agenda, demo-tenant screenshots, buyer inputs, and expected 90-day outputs before requesting access.

View walkthrough

Cost context

Anchors for internal comparison, with the caveats left visible.

These figures are not like-for-like alternatives and should not be treated as procurement advice. They are included only where the figure was recorded in discovery and could be tied to a dated public source.

Failure-to-prevent-fraud training course

A course seat is not a defence-file operating layer; it is a useful marker for training spend that may sit beside evidence operations.

GBP 595 per person

Source: Redcliffe Training public course page, accessed 2026-06-10.

AuditBoard procurement benchmark

Vendr is a third-party procurement benchmark, not AuditBoard list pricing or an ECCTA-specific quote.

USD 45,895 median annual contract value

Source: Vendr AuditBoard pricing benchmark, accessed 2026-06-10.

LogicGate procurement benchmark

Vendr is a third-party procurement benchmark; broad GRC suites are not equivalent to a focused 90-day DefenceFile pilot.

USD 50k-90k typical annual contract range

Source: Vendr LogicGate pricing benchmark, accessed 2026-06-10.

Buyer FAQ

Commercial answers without stretching the claims.

The pilot is deliberately bounded: evidence operations, workflow artifacts, and human review trails. Legal interpretation remains with counsel and advisers.

Is this legal advice?

No. DefenceFile organises evidence for legal and compliance review. It does not provide legal advice, create privilege, certify scope, certify reasonable procedures, or guarantee that a statutory defence will succeed.

What does the first working session produce?

The first working session produces five workflow artifacts: a scope posture screen, evidence gap map, associated-person attestation chase list, named review queue, and board-pack blocker list. If any of these are not delivered, the setup fee is waived — see the guarantee FAQ below.

What does the setup-fee guarantee cover?

If the first working session does not produce the agreed workflow artifacts, the setup fee is waived. The guarantee does not provide legal advice, create privilege, certify scope, certify reasonable procedures, or guarantee that a statutory defence will succeed.

What does it cost after the 90-day pilot?

After the 90-day pilot, continuation is month-to-month at GBP 950/month with no annual lock-in, and the founding-cohort monthly rate is held for 12 months from the pilot start. After that, the rate is reviewed at most once a year and any change is capped at UK CPI. Cancel in any month and export your board pack, evidence register, audit trail, and unresolved blocker list.

Why is the price lower than the GRC benchmarks?

The pilot is deliberately priced to clear internal approval without a full procurement cycle — the 90-day scope is narrow by design. A focused ECCTA defence-file engagement is not the same product as a broad enterprise GRC suite. The cost anchors below are context for internal comparison only, not equivalent products.

What if we decide not to continue after the pilot?

No annual lock-in applies at any point. Before the pilot ends, you can export the board-pack workpaper, evidence register, audit trail, and unresolved blocker list — the file is yours regardless of what happens next.

How should we think about data security?

Treat the pilot as a security and procurement review before sensitive evidence is shared. Public trust pages describe the current product posture; signed customer terms and DPA schedules control live commitments.

Review security posture

Why not use our law firm alone?

Use qualified advisers for legal interpretation, privilege, procedure design, and hard judgment calls. DefenceFile is the operating layer around that advice: collection, review state, source lineage, attestations, blockers, and handoff.

Compare advisory-only route

Why not use a generalist GRC suite?

A broad GRC platform may fit enterprise control programmes. DefenceFile is deliberately narrower: a 90-day ECCTA defence-file pilot focused on scope posture, evidence gaps, associated-person follow-up, human review, and board/adviser handoff.

Compare generalist GRC route

Next step

Request a fit review before sharing sensitive evidence.

The request form asks for fit context only. Keep privileged analysis and source documents out of the public request until procurement, security, and legal boundaries are agreed.

Request pilot review